physics2u
Depth
PU-204 / L20 · lecture

Fields of a Moving Point Charge: Lienard-Wiechert

~7 min read · Tier toggle changes depth (T1 plain · T2 standard · T3 rigour)

BEFORE YOU START

You must be comfortable with the concept of retarded time and the vector potential relation \(\mathbf{A} = \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c^2}V\). Familiarity with the chain rule for differentiating functions of retarded time is essential.

Why this matters

The Liénard–Wiechert fields provide the exact solution for the electromagnetic field of a point charge in arbitrary motion.

Static Coulomb fields fail to describe radiation because they assume instantaneous action. By incorporating the finite speed of light, the Liénard–Wiechert potentials separate the field into a "velocity" part (which falls off as \(1/R^2\)) and an "acceleration" part (which falls off as \(1/R\)). This separation is the mathematical origin of electromagnetic radiation, as only the acceleration term carries energy to infinity. Understanding this structure is the prerequisite for deriving the Larmor formula in the next lecture.

The Physical Picture

Imagine a charge moving through space. At any instant, the field you measure at a distant point depends on where the charge was when the light signal left it, not where it is now. This delay is the retarded time. The field has two distinct personalities. The first is the "near field," which points roughly toward the retarded position of the charge. It is strong nearby but weakens rapidly with distance, behaving like a static Coulomb field but distorted by the motion. The second is the "radiation field," which arises only if the charge accelerates. This component points perpendicular to the line of sight and falls off much more slowly with distance. It is this component that constitutes the electromagnetic wave carrying energy away from the source. The total field is the vector sum of these two parts.

Retarded Potentials

The starting point is the scalar potential \(V\) and vector potential \(\mathbf{A}\). For a point charge \(q\) at position \(\mathbf{w}(t_r)\) at the retarded time \(t_r\), the potentials are given by the Liénard–Wiechert expressions. The denominator \(Rc - \mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{v}\) accounts for the change in distance during the light travel time. If the charge moves towards the observer, the effective distance is shorter, increasing the potential.

\[ V = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{qc}{Rc - \mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{v}}, \quad \mathbf{A} = \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c^2}V \]

Here \(\mathbf{R} = \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{w}(t_r)\) is the vector from the retarded position to the field point. The relation \(\mathbf{A} = \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c^2}V\) follows because the current density of a point charge is its charge density times its velocity, \(\mathbf{J} = \rho\mathbf{v}\), and both potentials are built from the same retarded Green's function. Note that all quantities on the right-hand side, including \(\mathbf{v}\) and \(\mathbf{R}\), are evaluated at the retarded time \(t_r\).

Deriving the Electric Field

To find the electric field, we differentiate the potentials: \(\mathbf{E} = -\nabla V - \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}\). This calculation is notoriously tedious because the gradient \(\nabla\) and time derivative \(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\) act on the retarded time \(t_r\), which is a function of \(\mathbf{r}\) and \(t\). The key identity is that \(\nabla t_r = -\frac{\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{c(1 - \hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\boldsymbol{\beta})}\) and \(\frac{\partial t_r}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{1 - \hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\boldsymbol{\beta}}\), where \(\boldsymbol{\beta} = \mathbf{v}/c\). After careful algebraic manipulation, the field separates into two terms. The first term involves the velocity \(\mathbf{v}\) and is proportional to \(1/R^2\). The second term involves the acceleration \(\mathbf{a}\) and is proportional to \(1/R\).

\[ \mathbf{E} = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{R}{(\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{u})^3}\left[(c^2\!-\!v^2)\,\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{R}\times(\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{a})\right] \]

where \(\mathbf{u} \equiv c\hat{\mathbf{n}} - \mathbf{v}\). The term \((c^2 - v^2)\mathbf{u}\) is the velocity field, and \(\mathbf{R}\times(\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{a})\) is the acceleration field. The denominator \((\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{u})^3\) ensures the correct angular dependence and singularity structure. The magnetic field is simply \(\mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times\mathbf{E}\), which guarantees that \(\mathbf{B}\) is perpendicular to both \(\mathbf{E}\) and the direction of propagation \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\) in the radiation zone.

Velocity vs. Acceleration Fields

The distinction between the two parts of \(\mathbf{E}\) is crucial for understanding radiation. The velocity field, often called the "Coulomb" or "near" field, dominates at small distances. It falls off as \(1/R^2\), similar to the static electric field of a charge. However, it is not spherically symmetric; it is compressed in the direction of motion due to relativistic effects. This field does not carry net energy to infinity; it is bound to the charge.

The acceleration field, or "radiation" field, dominates at large distances. It falls off as \(1/R\). Because the Poynting vector \(\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{B}\) is proportional to \(E^2\), the energy flux from the radiation field falls off as \(1/R^2\). This means that the total power radiated through a sphere of radius \(R\) is independent of \(R\), indicating that energy is being carried away to infinity. The velocity field's energy flux falls off as \(1/R^4\), so its contribution to the total radiated power vanishes as \(R \to \infty\).

The derivation

◆ DERIVATION EMBED · D-169 · not re-derived here

Fields of a Moving Point Charge

For a point charge \( q \) moving on an arbitrary prescribed trajectory \( \mathbf{w}(t) \) with velocity \( \mathbf{v} = \dot{\mathbf{w}} \) and acceleration \( \mathbf{a} = \dot{\mathbf{v}} \), the retarded solutions of Maxwell's equations give the Liénard–Wiechert potentials \( V = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{qc}{Rc - \mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{v}} \) and \( \mathbf{A} = \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c^2}V \), where \( \mathbf{R} = \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{w}(t_r) \) is drawn from the retarded position and every source quantity is evaluated at the retarded time \( t_r \) defined by \( R(t_r) = c(t - t_r) \). Differentiating them yields the exact field \( \mathbf{E} = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{R}{(\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{u})^3}\left[(c^2 - v^2)\,\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{R}\times(\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{a})\right] \) with \( \mathbf{u} \equiv c\hat{\mathbf{n}} - \mathbf{v} \), \( \hat{\mathbf{n}} = \mathbf{R}/R \), together with \( \mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times\mathbf{E} \). The field separates cleanly into a velocity (near) field falling as \( 1/R^2 \) and an acceleration (radiation) field falling as \( 1/R \) — only the latter carries energy to infinity.

\[ V = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{qc}{Rc - \mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{v}}, \quad \mathbf{A} = \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c^2}V, \qquad \mathbf{E} = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{R}{(\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{u})^3}\left[(c^2\!-\!v^2)\,\mathbf{u} + \mathbf{R}\times(\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{a})\right], \quad \mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times\mathbf{E} \]
Open full derivation →
Tier 3 · watch out

A common misconception is that the "velocity field" is static. It is not. It changes with time as the charge moves, and it contains information about the charge's past trajectory. However, it does not radiate energy. The subtle point is that the separation into "velocity" and "acceleration" terms is frame-dependent. In a different inertial frame, the relative weights of these terms change, but \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) together transform as the components of a single antisymmetric field tensor (not a four-vector). The radiation field is invariant in the sense that if it is zero in one frame (e.g., uniform motion), it is zero in all frames. If it is non-zero (accelerated motion), it is non-zero in all frames, though its angular distribution may differ. C

Worked example

Problem. A proton (\(q = 1.60 \times 10^{-19}\ \mathrm{C}\)) moves with constant velocity \(\mathbf{v} = 0.5c\,\hat{\mathbf{x}}\). Find the electric field at \(\mathbf{r} = (0, 1.0\ \mathrm{m}, 0)\) at the instant the proton passes the origin, and compare it with the Coulomb field.

  1. With \(\mathbf{a} = 0\) only the velocity field survives. Rewriting it in terms of the present position gives the standard result \(\mathbf{E} = \dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{1-\beta^2}{(1-\beta^2\sin^2\theta)^{3/2}}\dfrac{\hat{\mathbf{R}}_p}{R_p^2}\), where \(\mathbf{R}_p\) runs from the present position to the field point and \(\theta\) is its angle to \(\mathbf{v}\). Remarkably, the field points away from where the charge is now, not from where it was.
  2. Here \(R_p = 1.0\ \mathrm{m}\), \(\theta = 90^\circ\), \(\beta = 0.5\): the factor is \(\dfrac{1-\beta^2}{(1-\beta^2)^{3/2}} = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} = \gamma = 1.155\).
  3. Coulomb field at 1 m: \(E_C = 8.99 \times 10^{9} \times 1.60 \times 10^{-19} = 1.44 \times 10^{-9}\ \mathrm{N\,C^{-1}}\).
  4. So \(E = \gamma E_C = 1.155 \times 1.44 \times 10^{-9} = 1.66 \times 10^{-9}\ \mathrm{N\,C^{-1}}\), along \(+\hat{\mathbf{y}}\). Along the line of motion (\(\theta = 0\)) the factor would instead be \(1-\beta^2 = 0.75\): the field is squeezed towards the plane perpendicular to the motion.
\[ E_\perp = \gamma\,\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 R_p^2} \approx 1.66 \times 10^{-9}\ \mathrm{N\,C^{-1}} \]

Units check. \(\mathrm{N\,m^2\,C^{-2}} \times \mathrm{C}/\mathrm{m^2} = \mathrm{N\,C^{-1}}\); \(\gamma\) is dimensionless.

CHECK YOURSELF

Three quick tests

  1. What is the dependence of the radiation field magnitude on distance \(R\)?
    AnswerIt falls off as \(1/R\).
  2. If a charge moves with constant velocity, does it radiate energy?
    AnswerNo, the acceleration is zero, so the radiation field is zero.
  3. What is the relationship between \(\mathbf{B}\) and \(\mathbf{E}\) in the radiation zone?
    Answer\(\mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times\mathbf{E}\), so \(\mathbf{B}\) is perpendicular to \(\mathbf{E}\) and \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\).
PROBLEMS

Problem set for PU-204 →

Each derivation in this unit ends with five graded problems with full solutions.

NOTES

Lecture notes checked line by line by the editor; every number in the worked example was recomputed.

Derivations cited: D-169 · Threads: force, energy, light