Biot–Savart Law from the Current Force Law
Statement
A steady current element I dl′ located at source point r′ produces, at field point r, a magnetic field B(r) = (μ0/4π) I dl′ × (r − r′) / |r − r′|³. This field is inverse-square in the source–field separation and transverse — perpendicular to both the current direction and the line of sight — and it is the field whose action on a second current element reproduces the empirical force law between two current-carrying circuits.
Why it matters
The Biot–Savart law is the magnetostatic analogue of Coulomb's law: it converts a specified steady current distribution directly into the field it sources, without solving a differential equation. Every downstream magnetostatic result — the field of a straight wire, a loop, a solenoid, and the identification of the magnetic dipole moment — is an integral of this one kernel.
Deriving it from the measured force between current elements, rather than postulating it, shows precisely which piece of the physics is an empirical inverse-square input and which pieces (transversality, the cross-product structure) are forced. It also exposes the well-known asymmetry of the element–element force, resolved only when one integrates over closed circuits where charge is conserved.
Assumptions
Derivation
Result
Reading. Each little length of current contributes a field that circulates around the wire: its magnitude falls as the inverse square of the distance and as the sine of the angle between the current and the line of sight, and its direction is set by the right-hand rule (dl′ crossed into the separation). Superpose (integrate) over the whole circuit to get the total field. The field is purely transverse — it has no component along ȓ.
Units check. [μ0] = T·m·A⁻¹. Then (T·m·A⁻¹)·(A·m)·(m)/(m³) = T·m·A⁻¹·A·m²/m³ = T. The result is a magnetic flux density in tesla, as required.
Limiting cases
- Collinear: when dl′ ∥ (r−r′), the cross product vanishes — a straight wire produces no field on its own axis.
- Perpendicular, θ = 90°: the contribution is maximal, |dB| = (μ0/4π) I dl′/r².
- Infinite straight wire: integrating gives B = μ0I/(2πs), the 1/s falloff of a line source.
- Far field of a closed loop: r ≫ loop size gives the magnetic dipole field B ∝ m/r³ with m = IA.
- Single moving charge: I dl′ → qv recovers B = (μ0/4π) qv×ȓ/r² (valid for v ≪ c).
Breaks when
- Non-steady currents. If ∂ρ/∂t ≠ 0, ∇·J ≠ 0 and the naïve line integral no longer satisfies ∇×B = μ0J; the missing displacement current μ0ε0∂E/∂t must be restored. Biot–Savart holds only in magnetostatics.
- Relativistic sources / retardation. For charges with v not ≪ c, the instantaneous 1/r² form is wrong; the field is set by the retarded position and acquires acceleration (radiation) fields. Biot–Savart is the v/c → 0 limit of the Liénard–Wiechert field.
- Open current segment in isolation. A single finite element is not a physical steady current (charge would pile up at its ends); its field is only meaningful as part of a closed-circuit integral. Applied to a lone open segment the third-law symmetry of step 6 fails.
- Magnetic media. In magnetized matter bound currents contribute; the free-space μ0 kernel must be replaced by the field of free plus magnetization currents.
Failure modes
- Dropping the sine. Using |dB| = (μ0/4π)I dl/r² for every element and forgetting the sin θ from the cross product — overcounts contributions from nearly-collinear elements.
- Wrong distance in the denominator. Using the perpendicular distance s to the wire instead of the actual element–point separation r inside the integrand. Only the fully integrated straight-wire result contains s.
- Right-hand-rule sign flip. Crossing (r−r′) into dl′ instead of dl′ into (r−r′), reversing B.
- Applying it to a lone open segment and expecting a physically complete, third-law-obeying force. Only closed circuits are consistent.
- Using it for fast-changing currents (AC at high frequency, antennas) where retardation and radiation dominate.
- Forgetting the field point is fixed while dl′ ranges over the source — integrating over the wrong variable.
Discussion
The derivation makes precise what is empirical and what is structural. The single experimental input is the element–element force law of step 2: inverse-square in separation, linear in each I dl. Given that, the transverse cross-product form of B is not an extra postulate — it is forced by matching the empirical force to the defining relation dF = I dl × B. Biot–Savart is therefore the field whose existence lets a two-body force be rewritten as "source produces field, field acts on test element."
The asymmetry exposed in step 6 is physically important. The Grassmann element–element force does not obey Newton's third law element-by-element: d²F2←1 ≠ −d²F1←2 in general. Momentum bookkeeping is rescued only after integrating around closed circuits, where the offending term integrates to zero because ∮ d(1/r) = 0. Physically, the "missing" momentum in the open-segment case is carried by the electromagnetic field itself — a first hint that the field is a dynamical object, not just bookkeeping.
Structurally, Biot–Savart is the curl of a vector potential: B = ∇×A with A(r) = (μ0/4π)∫ J(r′)/|r−r′| d³r′, the exact magnetostatic analogue of the Coulomb potential. This guarantees ∇·B = 0 identically (no magnetic monopoles) and reduces the two curl-and-divergence field equations to a Poisson equation ∇²A = −μ0J in the Coulomb gauge. Seen this way the Biot–Savart kernel is nothing but the Green's function of the Laplacian, curled. The same 1/|r−r′| Green's function underlies both electrostatics and magnetostatics; the difference is only whether the source is a scalar charge density or a vector current density.
Common misconceptions. Biot–Savart is not "just Coulomb for magnetism" applied to a fictitious magnetic charge — there is no magnetic charge, and the field circulates rather than pointing radially. Nor is the current element a stand-alone physical entity: it is a formal integrand, meaningful only inside a closed-loop integral. And the law is not universally valid — it is the static (or slow) limit; for radiating systems the retarded, relativistic field replaces it.
Worked examples
Reading. Comparable to Earth's field — a modest lab loop. Units check. (T·m/A)(A)/(m) = T. ✓
Reading. An infinite wire (θ → 90°) would give μ0I/2πs = 1.0×10⁻⁴ T; the finite segment is smaller, as expected. Units check. (T·m/A)(A)/(m) = T. ✓
Problems
- Show that on the axis of a circular loop of radius R, at distance z from the centre, B = μ0IR²/[2(R²+z²)3/2].
Solution
Each element gives |dB| = (μ0/4π)I dl′/(R²+z²), since dl′ ⊥ ȓ. By symmetry only the axial component survives: multiply by cos α = R/√(R²+z²). Integrate ∮ dl′ = 2πR: B = (μ0/4π)I(2πR)/(R²+z²) × R/√(R²+z²) = μ0IR²/[2(R²+z²)3/2]. At z=0 this reduces to μ0I/2R. ✓ - An infinitely long straight wire carries I = 20 A. Find B at s = 10 cm.
Solution
B = μ0I/(2πs) = (4π×10⁻⁷)(20)/(2π×0.10) = (2×10⁻⁷×20)/0.10 = 4.0×10⁻⁵ T = 40 μT. - Two long parallel wires 5.0 cm apart each carry 15 A in the same direction. Find the force per unit length and its sign.
Solution
Wire 1 produces B = μ0I/2πd = (2×10⁻⁷×15)/0.050 = 6.0×10⁻⁵ T at wire 2. Force per length F/L = IB = 15×6.0×10⁻⁵ = 9.0×10⁻⁴ N/m. Same-direction currents attract, so the force is attractive. - Using I dl′ → qv, find B from a proton (q=1.6×10⁻¹⁹ C) moving at v=1.0×10⁶ m/s, at 1.0 nm directly to its side (θ=90°).
Solution
B = (μ0/4π)qv sin θ/r² = (10⁻⁷)(1.6×10⁻¹⁹)(1.0×10⁶)(1)/(1.0×10⁻⁹)² = (10⁻⁷)(1.6×10⁻¹³)/(10⁻¹⁸) = 1.6×10⁻² T = 16 mT. (Valid since v≪c.) - A square loop of side a = 8.0 cm carries I = 2.5 A. Find B at its centre.
Solution
Each side is a finite wire at perpendicular distance s = a/2 = 0.040 m subtending half-angles of 45° each side (sin 45° = 0.707). One side: Bside = (μ0I/4πs)(2 sin 45°) = (10⁻⁷×2.5/0.040)(1.414) = (6.25×10⁻⁶)(1.414) = 8.84×10⁻⁶ T. Four sides add: B = 4×8.84×10⁻⁶ = 3.5×10⁻⁵ T ≈ 35 μT, directed out of the loop plane by the right-hand rule.