Damped, Driven Oscillators and Resonance
Statement
For a linear oscillator of mass m, restoring constant k and linear drag b, driven by F(t) = F0 cos ωt, the long-time (steady-state) motion is x(t) = A(ω) cos(ωt − δ) with amplitude A(ω) = (F0/m) / √[(ω02 − ω2)2 + 4β2ω2], phase lag tan δ = 2βω / (ω02 − ω2), an amplitude-resonance peak at ωr = √(ω02 − 2β2), and a sharpness set by the quality factor Q = ω0/2β, where ω02 = k/m and β = b/2m.
Why it matters
Almost every measuring instrument, filter, and structural element that responds to a periodic input is, near one of its normal modes, a driven damped oscillator. The three outputs derived here — how large the response is, how much it lags the drive, and how sharply it peaks — are exactly what an engineer tunes or an experimenter exploits, from a seismometer and a radio front-end to nuclear magnetic resonance and the mirrors of a gravitational-wave detector.
The single dimensionless number Q compresses the whole story: it is simultaneously the resonant gain over the static response, the ratio of centre frequency to bandwidth, and 2π times the energy stored per energy lost per cycle. Learning to read Q off the equation of motion is one of the highest-leverage skills in applied physics.
Assumptions
Derivation
Result
Reading. At low drive frequency the mass follows the force nearly in phase with the static deflection F0/k (δ → 0). As ω approaches ω0 the amplitude swells to roughly Q times that static value and the response crosses δ = 90° exactly at ω = ω0. Well above resonance the mass can no longer keep up: the amplitude falls as F0/mω2 and the motion swings toward antiphase (δ → 180°). A larger Q (weaker damping) means a taller, narrower peak sitting closer to ω0.
Units check. F0/m has units N·kg−1 = m·s−2. Every term under the root is a squared frequency: (s−2)2 = s−4, so the root is s−2. Hence A = (m·s−2)/(s−2) = m ✓. The argument of tan δ is (s−2)/(s−2), dimensionless, and Q = ω0/2β is (s−1)/(s−1), dimensionless ✓.
Limiting cases
- Static / DC limit (ω → 0): A → (F0/m)/ω02 = F0/k and δ → 0: the spring simply balances a slowly varying force.
- High-frequency / mass-controlled limit (ω ≫ ω0): A → F0/mω2 and δ → 180°: inertia dominates and the mass moves opposite to the force.
- Exactly at ω = ω0: A = F0/(2mβω0) = Q F0/k and δ = 90° — the velocity is in phase with the drive, so power transfer is maximal.
- Weak damping (β ≪ ω0, Q ≫ 1): ωr ≈ ω0(1 − β2/ω02) ≈ ω0 and the resonance is a sharp Lorentzian of width Δω = ω0/Q.
- Critical / heavy damping (β ≥ ω0/√2): ωr2 ≤ 0, the amplitude peak vanishes, and A(ω) falls monotonically from its DC value.
- Zero damping (β → 0): A diverges at ω = ω0 and δ jumps discontinuously from 0 to 180° — the idealised undamped resonance catastrophe.
Breaks when
- Large amplitude / nonlinear spring. When the drive pushes the displacement beyond the Hooke regime, the effective stiffness becomes amplitude-dependent (Duffing). The resonance curve leans over, folds back on itself, and shows amplitude jumps and hysteresis as ω is swept up versus down — the single-valued Lorentzian no longer exists.
- Non-viscous damping. Dry Coulomb friction (constant magnitude) or quadratic aerodynamic drag (∝ ẋ2) breaks linearity: superposition and the complex-X method fail, the amplitude does not diverge as β → 0, and the phase relation is no longer arctan-shaped.
- Transient not yet decayed. For times t ≲ 1/β (which is Q cycles) after the drive is switched on, the motion is steady state plus a decaying homogeneous solution, producing ring-up and beats; the steady-state formulas apply only asymptotically.
- Overdamped / undefined Q. Once β ≥ ω0 the resonant frequency ωr is imaginary and Q ≤ ½; talk of a "resonance peak" or "bandwidth" becomes meaningless.
Failure modes
- Confusing the three "resonant" frequencies. Amplitude resonance is at ωr = √(ω02 − 2β2), velocity/power resonance is exactly at ω0, and the free-decay frequency is ωd = √(ω02 − β2) — three different numbers, equal only in the β → 0 limit.
- Dropping the factor of 2 in the damping term. Writing β = b/m instead of b/2m propagates into Q, the linewidth, and every peak height.
- Getting the sign / quadrant of δ wrong. Above resonance ω02 − ω2 < 0, so tan δ is negative but δ lies in the second quadrant (between 90° and 180°); blindly taking arctan gives a spurious negative lag.
- Assuming the peak amplitude occurs where velocity or power is maximal. Maximum energy dissipation is at ω0, not at ωr; students who maximise the wrong quantity misplace the peak.
- Using the amplitude formula during switch-on transients. Applying steady-state A(ω) before the system has rung up for ∼Q cycles gives the wrong instantaneous displacement.
- Reading Q off the amplitude FWHM instead of the power FWHM. The bandwidth relation Q = ω0/Δω uses the half-power (1/√2 amplitude) points, not the half-amplitude points.
Discussion
The physics hides three competing agents in the denominator of A(ω). At low frequency the stiffness term ω02 wins and the spring sets the response; at high frequency the inertial term ω2 wins and the mass sets it; these two cancel at ω = ω0, leaving only the damping term 2βω to limit the amplitude. Resonance is precisely this cancellation of the reactive (spring and mass) contributions, exposing the small dissipative one — which is why the peak height scales as 1/β and the phase passes through 90° there.
The 90° phase crossing is the deepest single feature. When the displacement lags the force by a quarter cycle, the velocity is exactly in phase with the drive, so the instantaneous power Fẋ is always positive on average and energy is pumped in most efficiently. This is why the sharp, symmetric Lorentzian belongs to the power-absorption curve and peaks at ω0, whereas the amplitude peak sits slightly below at ωr. The quality factor unifies these views: Q = ω0/2β equals the resonant gain, equals the number of radians of free oscillation before the energy falls by e, and equals 2π × (energy stored)/(energy dissipated per cycle).
The same algebra reappears verbatim across physics with a change of names: the series RLC circuit maps m → L, b → R, k → 1/C, giving Q = (1/R)√(L/C) and the identical Lorentzian used for radio tuning. In wave and quantum contexts the driven-oscillator response function becomes the complex susceptibility or the Breit–Wigner cross-section, where ω0 is a resonant energy and 2β a decay width Γ = ħ/τ — the finite lifetime of an excited state is literally the damping of a driven oscillator.
Viewed as a linear system, the steady-state relation X = χ(ω)(F0/m) defines a complex response function χ(ω) = 1/(ω02 − ω2 + 2iβω) whose poles sit at ω = iβ ± ωd in the upper half-plane. Their upper-half-plane location is exactly the statement of causality (the response cannot precede the force), and it forces the real and imaginary parts of χ — the in-phase elastic response and the out-of-phase absorptive response — to obey the Kramers–Kronig dispersion relations. The single damped oscillator is thus the archetype linear-response system, and the fluctuation–dissipation theorem ties the same 2β that damps the driven motion to the thermal noise the oscillator emits at equilibrium.
Common misconceptions. Resonance does not mean the amplitude becomes infinite — that only happens for the unphysical β = 0 case; real damping always caps it at Amax = QF0/k. And "driving at the natural frequency" gives maximum power absorption (at ω0) but not quite maximum amplitude (at the slightly lower ωr); the distinction only matters when damping is not negligible.
Worked examples
Reading. The static deflection F0/k = 10 mm is amplified twentyfold at resonance, exactly the Q = 20 gain. Units check. (m·s−2)/(s−1·s−1) = m ✓.
Reading. Driven above ω0 the amplitude has already dropped from its 200 mm peak to 18 mm, and the mass moves almost exactly opposite to the force — inertia dominates. Units check. (m·s−2)/(s−2) = m ✓; δ dimensionless ✓.
Problems
- A driven damped oscillator has m = 0.20 kg, k = 80 N·m−1, and b = 0.16 kg·s−1. Find ω0 and Q.
Solution
ω0 = √(k/m) = √(80/0.20) = √400 = 20 rad·s−1. β = b/2m = 0.16/0.40 = 0.40 s−1. Q = ω0/2β = 20/0.80 = 25. - For the oscillator of Problem 1, driven by F0 = 1.0 N, find the static deflection and the peak amplitude Amax.
Solution
Static: A0 = F0/k = 1.0/80 = 0.0125 m = 12.5 mm. Weak damping (Q = 25), so Amax ≈ Q A0 = 25 × 0.0125 = 0.31 m. (Exact: Amax = (F0/m)/[2β√(ω02−β2)] = 5.0/[0.80·√399.84] = 5.0/15.997 = 0.3126 m, confirming 0.31 m.) - A tuning fork behaves as a lightly damped oscillator at f0 = 440 Hz. After being struck, its free vibration amplitude falls to 1/e of its initial value in 2.0 s. Estimate Q.
Solution
Free amplitude decays as e−βt, so 1/e occurs at t = 1/β = 2.0 s ⇒ β = 0.50 s−1. ω0 = 2πf0 = 2π(440) = 2765 rad·s−1. Q = ω0/2β = 2765/1.0 = ≈ 2.8 × 103. (Equivalently Q = ω0τ/2 with τ = 2.0 s.) - Show that at the half-power points the amplitude has fallen to 1/√2 of its resonant value, and that for weak damping these occur at ω ≈ ω0 ± β, giving bandwidth Δω = 2β and Q = ω0/Δω.
Solution
Near resonance write ω = ω0 + ε with |ε| ≪ ω0. Then ω02 − ω2 = (ω0−ω)(ω0+ω) ≈ (−ε)(2ω0) = −2ω0ε, and 2βω ≈ 2βω0. The denominator squared is D ≈ 4ω02(ε2 + β2), so A2 ∝ 1/(ε2 + β2) — a Lorentzian in ε. At ε = 0, A2 is maximal; the power (∝ A2) halves when ε2 + β2 = 2β2, i.e. ε = ±β, where A = Apeak/√2. The two points are ω = ω0 ± β, so Δω = 2β and Q = ω0/2β = ω0/Δω. ✓ - A series RLC circuit has L = 10 mH, C = 1.0 µF, R = 5.0 Ω, driven by an AC source. Find the resonant (angular) frequency, Q, and the −3 dB bandwidth in Hz.
Solution
Map m→L, b→R, k→1/C. ω0 = 1/√(LC) = 1/√(10×10−3 · 1.0×10−6) = 1/√(10−8) = 1.0×104 rad·s−1. Q = ω0L/R = (104)(0.010)/5.0 = 100/5.0 = 20. Bandwidth Δω = ω0/Q = 104/20 = 500 rad·s−1, so Δf = Δω/2π = 500/6.283 = 80 Hz (centre frequency f0 = ω0/2π ≈ 1.6 kHz).