Longitudinal Sound Waves in a Fluid
Statement
For small-amplitude longitudinal disturbances in an inviscid compressible fluid, the excess pressure p (and equivalently the particle displacement ξ and the density perturbation ρ′) obeys the one-dimensional wave equation ∂2p/∂t2 = c2 ∂2p/∂x2, propagating with speed c = √(B/ρ0), which for an ideal gas whose compressions are adiabatic becomes c = √(γ P0/ρ0).
Why it matters
Sound is the archetype of a mechanical wave in a continuum: unlike the loaded string, where a discrete restoring tension was imposed by hand, here the restoring force emerges from the fluid's own compressibility. The derivation shows how the same wave equation drops out of the two most basic statements one can make about a fluid — that mass is conserved and that Newton's second law holds locally.
The result c = √(γ P0/ρ0) is also a small historical landmark: Newton's isothermal estimate √(P0/ρ0) was about 16% low, and the discrepancy was not resolved until Laplace recognised that the compressions in a sound wave are adiabatic, not isothermal. The factor γ is the physical fingerprint of that insight.
Assumptions
Derivation
Work in one dimension. Let ρ0 and P0 be the uniform equilibrium density and pressure, and write the perturbed fields as ρ = ρ0 + ρ′, P = P0 + p, with fluid velocity u(x,t). All of ρ′, p, u are first-order small.
Result
Reading. The pressure perturbation propagates undistorted at a single speed c set by how stiff the fluid is (bulk modulus Bad, the numerator) against how heavy it is (density ρ0, the denominator) — stiffer means faster, denser means slower, exactly the tension-over-mass-density pattern of the string. For an ideal gas the stiffness is γ P0, so c depends only on temperature and molecular mass, not on the pressure or density separately.
Units check. [P0/ρ0] = (Pa)/(kg m−3) = (N m−2)/(kg m−3) = (kg m−1 s−2)/(kg m−3) = m2 s−2, and γ is dimensionless, so √(γ P0/ρ0) has units m s−1. Likewise [R T/M] = (J mol−1 K−1·K)/(kg mol−1) = J kg−1 = m2 s−2. ✓
Limiting cases
- Isothermal limit (Newton). If heat equilibrated instantly, γ → 1 and c → √(P0/ρ0), about 16% lower for air (γ = 1.4). This is the historically wrong answer, showing the adiabatic assumption is essential.
- Temperature scaling. Since c = √(γ R T/M), the speed rises as √T: air at 0 °C gives ≈ 331 m/s, at 20 °C ≈ 343 m/s. It is independent of ambient pressure at fixed T.
- Molecular mass scaling. Lighter gas, faster sound: helium (M ≈ 4 g/mol, γ = 5/3) carries sound at ≈ 970 m/s, roughly three times air — the "squeaky voice" effect.
- Incompressible limit. As Bad → ∞ (a rigid, incompressible medium), c → ∞: disturbances propagate instantaneously, and the wave description collapses to constraint dynamics.
- Liquid/solid. The general form c = √(B/ρ) still holds; water (B ≈ 2.2 GPa, ρ ≈ 1000 kg/m³) gives c ≈ 1480 m/s. Only the ideal-gas specialisation γ P/ρ is lost.
Breaks when
- Finite amplitude. When perturbations are not small (loud sound, blast waves), the dropped nonlinear terms matter: crests travel faster than troughs, the waveform steepens, and a shock forms across which the linear theory and single c are invalid.
- Strong dissipation / high frequency. When viscosity and thermal conduction are not negligible — ultrasound in gases, sound at very low ambient pressure, or when the acoustic period approaches the molecular relaxation time — the wave attenuates and becomes dispersive, so a single non-attenuating speed no longer describes it.
- Breakdown of continuum. When the wavelength approaches the molecular mean free path (rarefied gas, very high-frequency ultrasound), pressure and density cease to be smooth fields; hydrodynamics fails and kinetic theory is required.
- Departure from adiabatic behaviour. In media where heat conducts efficiently on the timescale of a period (some porous or metallic contexts, very slow low-frequency limits), the compressions are no longer adiabatic and the factor γ is wrong.
Failure modes
- Using isothermal B = P0. Forgetting Laplace's correction and writing c = √(P0/ρ0) — the classic 16% error. The bulk modulus in a sound wave is the adiabatic one, γ P0.
- Thinking c depends on pressure. Concluding that pumping up the pressure at fixed temperature raises the sound speed. At fixed T, P0/ρ0 is constant, so c does not change.
- Mixing molar and specific gas constants. Using c = √(γ R T/M) with R = 8.314 J mol⁻¹K⁻¹ but M in g/mol instead of kg/mol, giving an answer √1000 ≈ 31.6× too large.
- Retaining nonlinear terms inconsistently. Keeping u ∂u/∂x but dropping ∂(ρ′u)/∂x, or vice versa. Both are second order; a consistent linearisation drops all of them together.
- Confusing particle velocity u with wave speed c. The fluid oscillates at speed u (millimetres per second for ordinary sound); the disturbance pattern travels at c ≈ 343 m/s. They are unrelated in magnitude.
- Using γ for the wrong gas. Applying γ = 1.4 (diatomic) to a monatomic gas like helium or argon, where γ = 5/3, or to a polyatomic gas.
Discussion
The deep lesson is that the wave equation and its speed came from combining three independent inputs: conservation of mass, Newton's second law, and a thermodynamic equation of state. The first two are pure mechanics and would hold for any compressible fluid; the third is where the physics of the specific medium enters. The propagation speed is therefore not a mechanical quantity alone — it is fixed by an equilibrium thermodynamic derivative (dP/dρ) evaluated along the correct thermodynamic path. That path is adiabatic, and choosing it correctly is the whole content of the Newton–Laplace story.
Compare with the loaded string, whose wave equation we already have. There the speed was √(T/μ) — a restoring quantity (tension) over an inertial quantity (linear mass density). Here it is √(B/ρ) — restoring stiffness over volumetric inertia. The two are the same structural statement, "restoring ÷ inertia", realised in different physical hardware. This is why the string is a legitimate stepping-stone: once you trust that a linear restoring force plus inertia gives ∂tt = c2∂xx, sound is just the identification of the fluid's own restoring stiffness.
A subtler point is that adiabaticity here is not an assumption of "no heat ever" but of a separation of timescales. Heat diffuses a distance √(χ/f) in one acoustic period (χ the thermal diffusivity, f the frequency), which for audible sound in air is far smaller than a wavelength; so each compression is essentially thermally isolated. The same reasoning, run in reverse, tells us exactly where the adiabatic picture must fail — at frequencies high enough that thermal diffusion keeps pace with the oscillation, the compressions become isothermal and c drifts from √(γ P/ρ) toward √(P/ρ), with dissipation in between. The single number γ thus quietly encodes an entire assumed hierarchy of timescales.
Common misconceptions. Sound speed is often thought to increase with loudness — it does not, to leading order; amplitude affects the wave only through the nonlinear corrections that produce shocks. It is also commonly believed that denser air (say, humid or high-pressure air) transmits sound faster; in fact humid air is less dense and slightly faster, and at fixed temperature pressure has no effect at all because P/ρ is pinned by temperature.
Worked examples
Example 1 — Speed of sound in air at 20 °C.
Reading. The standard textbook value for air at 20 °C, matching measurement to three figures. Had we (wrongly) used γ = 1, we would have obtained 290 m/s — the size of Newton's error.
Example 2 — Sound speed in helium, and the voice effect.
Reading. Sound travels almost three times faster in helium. The resonant frequencies of the vocal tract (fixed by its geometry, f ∝ c/L) rise by the same factor, raising the formant pitch — the familiar cartoon voice. Note the pitch of the vocal-cord vibration itself is unchanged; only the resonances shift.
Problems
- Temperature dependence. By what percentage does the speed of sound in air change between a cold morning (−10 °C) and a hot afternoon (35 °C)?
Solution
c ∝ √T with T in kelvin. T1 = 263.15 K, T2 = 308.15 K. Ratio c2/c1 = √(308.15/263.15) = √1.1710 = 1.0821. So the speed rises by about 8.2%. In absolute terms c1 ≈ 325 m/s, c2 ≈ 352 m/s.
- Newton vs Laplace. Compute the sound speed in air at 0 °C using (a) the isothermal formula and (b) the adiabatic formula, and give the percentage by which Newton's value falls short. Take P0 = 1.013×10⁵ Pa, ρ0 = 1.293 kg/m³, γ = 1.40.
Solution
(a) Isothermal: c = √(P0/ρ0) = √(1.013×10⁵/1.293) = √(78 344) = 280 m/s. (b) Adiabatic: c = √(1.40 × 78 344) = √(109 682) = 331 m/s. Shortfall = 1 − 280/331 = 0.154, about 15.4% (≈ 1 − 1/√1.4). The measured value at 0 °C is 331 m/s, vindicating Laplace.
- Bulk modulus of water. Sound travels at 1480 m/s in water of density 1000 kg/m³. Using the general result, find water's bulk modulus and compare with air's γ P0 ≈ 1.42×10⁵ Pa.
Solution
c = √(B/ρ) ⇒ B = ρ c2 = 1000 × (1480)² = 1000 × 2.190×10⁶ = 2.19×10⁹ Pa = 2.19 GPa. This is about 1.5×10⁴ times air's effective modulus. Water is far denser than air (×~1000) but vastly stiffer (×~15 000), and stiffness wins, so sound is ~4.3× faster in water than in air.
- Particle velocity vs wave speed. A plane sound wave in air (ρ0 = 1.21 kg/m³, c = 343 m/s) has pressure amplitude p0 = 28 Pa (about 120 dB, painfully loud). Find the peak particle velocity u0 and compare it with c. Use u0 = p0/(ρ0c).
Solution
The acoustic impedance is Z = ρ0c = 1.21 × 343 = 415 Pa·s/m. Then u0 = p0/Z = 28/415 = 0.0675 m/s ≈ 6.7 cm/s. Ratio u0/c = 0.0675/343 = 2.0×10⁻⁴. Even at the threshold of pain the fluid oscillates at ~7 cm/s while the wave pattern travels at 343 m/s — a ratio of ~1/5000, confirming the small-amplitude assumption and the distinction between u and c.
- Identifying an unknown gas. At 300 K the speed of sound in an unknown diatomic gas (γ = 1.40) is measured to be 323 m/s. Estimate its molar mass and identify the gas.
Solution
From c = √(γ R T/M), solve for the mass: M = γ R T/c2 = (1.40 × 8.314 × 300)/(323)² = 3492/1.0433×10⁵ = 0.03347 kg/mol = 33.5 g/mol. This is very close to 32 g/mol, and with γ = 1.40 (diatomic) the gas is oxygen, O₂. Cross-check: for O₂ exactly, c = √(1.40×8.314×300/0.032) = √(1.0912×10⁵) = 330 m/s, within 2% of the measurement — the small gap is the sort of error real thermometry and molar-mass rounding introduce. The method is: invert the formula for M, then match to a known molecule of the right γ.